CAD Design Pathway¶
The CAD Design pathway teaches students to model parts, assemblies, and full subsystems in a way that supports design reviews, manufacturing, wiring, and programming. The emphasis is on design intent, communication, and building models that are useful in the real robot process.
Core Public Resources¶
- FRC Design Educator Guide
- FRC Design Stage 1 Overview
- FRC Design Stage 1A CAD Fundamentals
- FIRST Playing Field Resources
Level Pages¶
- Level 0 Overview
- Level 0 Exercises
- Level 1 Overview
- Level 1 Exercises
- Level 2 Overview
- Level 2 Exercises
- Level 3 Overview
- Level 3 Exercises
- Level 4 Overview
- Level 4 Exercises
Level 0: Exposure¶
Learning objectives
- Understand what CAD is and why teams use it
- Navigate a CAD workspace and inspect existing robot models
- Create a first sketch and first solid part
Required skills
- Orbit, pan, zoom, and select correctly
- Open and inspect a part studio or assembly
- Save and name files clearly
Core concepts and theory
- Sketches, features, parts, and assemblies
- Constraints and dimensions
- Why CAD matters for communication and manufacturing
Hands-on activities
- Tour a robot assembly
- Sketch and extrude a simple box or bracket
- Identify major robot subsystems inside a shared model
Suggested mini-projects
- Simple mounting plate
- Practice box tube part
Assessment of mastery
- Student creates a simple part and identifies major CAD workspace tools
- Student explains the difference between a part and an assembly
Common mistakes and troubleshooting
- Unconstrained sketches
- Random file names
- Modeling without checking dimensions
Expected outcomes
- Ready for structured sketching and part modeling practice
Level 1: Foundations¶
Learning objectives
- Create well-constrained sketches and basic features
- Model common FRC parts such as gussets, plates, and tubes
- Build habits that support clean, editable models
Required skills
- Fully constrain sketches
- Use extrude, cut, fillet, pattern, and hole features
- Organize parts and features clearly
Core concepts and theory
- Design intent
- Parametric modeling
- Common FRC geometry and hardware references
Hands-on activities
- Complete guided Onshape or CAD learning modules
- Model brackets, rails, and gussets
- Practice with symmetric and mirrored parts
Suggested mini-projects
- Battery tray or sensor bracket
- Small chassis corner assembly
Assessment of mastery
- Student submits a clean, fully constrained part
- Student can edit dimensions without breaking the model
Common mistakes and troubleshooting
- Overdefined or underdefined sketches
- Features built in an order that is hard to edit later
- Missing clearance for hardware
Expected outcomes
- Can model simple robot parts accurately
Level 2: Application¶
Learning objectives
- Build assemblies with motion and interface awareness
- Model parts that can be manufactured and assembled in reality
- Collaborate with Mechanical and Manufacturing using shared models
Required skills
- Use mates or constraints correctly in assemblies
- Model around standard hardware and purchased components
- Check fit, access, and interference
Core concepts and theory
- Tolerances and clearances
- Multi-part modeling and top-down workflows
- Design for manufacture and assembly
Hands-on activities
- Build a gearbox, intake, elevator, or other multi-part assembly
- Insert motors, bearings, shafts, and hardware from libraries
- Run interference and packaging checks
Suggested mini-projects
- Roller intake assembly
- Simple elevator or arm assembly
Assessment of mastery
- Student produces an assembly another student can understand and manufacture from
- Student identifies and resolves at least one interference or tolerance issue
Common mistakes and troubleshooting
- Floating parts from incorrect mates
- Modeling nominal geometry with no assembly thought
- Ignoring fastener access and wrench clearance
Expected outcomes
- Can own CAD for a simple mechanism or subsystem
Level 3: Leadership¶
Learning objectives
- Lead subsystem CAD from layout to release
- Use CAD as the center of design reviews and integration planning
- Manage revisions without losing clarity or downstream trust
Required skills
- Create layout sketches and architecture models
- Coordinate interfaces with Manufacturing, Electrical, and Programming
- Drive review discussions using the model as evidence
Core concepts and theory
- Top-down subsystem design
- Packaging, center of mass awareness, and serviceability
- Release discipline and revision control
Hands-on activities
- Lead CAD for a competition subsystem
- Prepare screenshots, exploded views, and review callouts
- Update models based on prototype and test feedback
Suggested mini-projects
- Full subsystem release package
- Robot electronics packaging and service-access study
Assessment of mastery
- Student leads a review that results in actionable manufacturing-ready output
- CAD accurately reflects the built subsystem after revision
Common mistakes and troubleshooting
- CAD that looks complete but omits hardware or integration details
- Releasing models before adjacent teams confirm interfaces
- Unclear naming and version drift
Expected outcomes
- Can lead CAD for major robot subsystems
Level 4: Mentor¶
Learning objectives
- Create scalable CAD standards and training workflows
- Teach design intent, organization, and review discipline
- Support multi-team collaboration with reusable systems and libraries
Required skills
- Build and maintain CAD templates, libraries, and standards
- Coach students through design decisions rather than only fixing models
- Connect CAD outputs to manufacturing, electrical layout, and software needs
Core concepts and theory
- Knowledge transfer through model structure
- Standardization of origins, naming, and release process
- Curriculum design for CAD growth
Hands-on activities
- Run beginner CAD labs
- Maintain a team part library or standards document
- Audit older CAD projects and improve usability
Suggested mini-projects
- Team CAD handbook
- Standardized subsystem template library
Assessment of mastery
- New students reach productive CAD work faster because of the training system
- Team design quality improves through clearer reviews and cleaner releases
Common mistakes and troubleshooting
- Teaching button clicks without teaching design intent
- Library sprawl with inconsistent naming
- Models that are hard for new students to navigate
Expected outcomes
- Can mentor CAD training, design review practice, and standards across teams